Monarch VS Democracy: Perspective on Government Systems

 

Monarchy and democracy represent two distinct forms of government, each with its own set of principles and implications for society. Monarchy is characterized by a hereditary ruler, known as the monarch, who holds the position of head of state for life. On the other hand, democracy is a system of government in which power is vested in the people through elected representatives.

While democracy is often hailed as a system that upholds individual freedoms and promotes equality among citizens, some critics argue that it can also be a source of corruption. They point to the birth of capitalism, socialism, and globalization as offspring of democracy, leading to the emergence of systems such as privatization and the highly contentious tendering system.

The tendering system, in particular, has been criticized as one of the most corrupt practices in governance, where contracts are awarded based on competitive bids rather than merit or public interest. Critics argue that for a country to thrive and ensure its survival, it must move away from tenders and focus on building state capacity to provide permanent and pensionable employment opportunities for its citizens.

Globalization and privatization, which are often associated with democracy, have been accused of undermining countries and turning their citizens into economic slaves. The rich become wealthier while the poor fall deeper into poverty, creating a growing wealth gap that poses significant social and economic challenges.

In contrast, proponents of monarchy argue that it can be a solution for African countries if implemented effectively. They contend that a well-functioning monarchy has the potential to empower citizens and build a sense of national identity, rather than perpetuating systems of exploitation and inequality.

Moreover, monarchies can also embody democratic values while preserving their traditional roles, allowing for citizen development from the grassroots level and the creation of permanent, pensionable jobs. By offering stable employment and fostering a sense of citizenship, monarchies have the potential to ensure that individuals are not merely economic subjects but active participants in shaping the future of their nation.

Ultimately, the debate between monarchy and democracy highlights the ongoing discourse surrounding governance and the role of the state in shaping society. While each system has its strengths and weaknesses, the question of how best to govern and serve the interests of the people remains a central concern for nations seeking to achieve sustainable development and social cohesio